GridGraph / Brief · 2026-09-20 / Major schedule changes

Schedule change
Opportunity · High66

The opportunity score estimates how actionable a registry change may be as an investigation lead. It is not a probability, a financial estimate, or a confirmed commercial opportunity. How material the registry change itself is gets a separate signal materiality score.

Opportunity score 66

  • Project scale (MW): 17
  • Event type: 12
  • Lifecycle stage: 10
  • Recency: 6
  • Operator identified: 10
  • Multi-unit evidence: 6
  • Size of change: 5

Signal materiality 57

  • Event type: 16
  • Size of change: 19
  • MW affected: 12
  • Units affected: 10

Commissioning delayed by up to 212 days — 4 units / 28 MW

Aschersleben, Sachsen-Anhalt · Operator: Windpark Aschersleben West GmbH ＆ Co. Betriebs-KG

4 units · 28 MW

MaStR evidence: HIGHExternal verification: Not checkedGrouping: Likely site group
Asset typeHorizontalläufer
Energy carrierWind
Registered operatorWindpark Aschersleben West GmbH ＆ Co. Betriebs-KG

What changed

4 wind units registered a later planned commissioning date (+212 days).

Why this ranks high. Mid-sized 28 MW signal, 4 registrations moving together, unusually large schedule shift (212 days) and the registered operator is known. It may still reflect a registry correction rather than a new commercial need.

Why it may matter

A material schedule shift may indicate a change in project timing and could alter when supplier or service requirements arise. It may also reflect a registry correction.

Possible relevance

Developer servicesEngineeringMarket intelligence

Investigation hypotheses only. They are not evidence that any of these needs currently exist.

Verify next

Change summary

Units with a new planned date
4
Planned commissioning (same for every unit)
Sept 2026 → Apr 2027 (+212 days)

Underlying registrations

GridGraph explains what changed here; each registration below links out to its own official MaStR record for independent verification. This is a group-level view — official links are unit-level evidence.

Underlying registrations (4)

Grouping basis

Grouping basisLikely site group
Supporting registry evidence: Identical registered capacity; Identical registered change on every unit; Same planned/commissioning date on every unit
These registrations share municipality, operator, technology and change type, and several registered facts agree. GridGraph groups them for presentation and does not assert that this is one canonical development project.

MaStR technical details

Asset type (MaStR)
Horizontalläufer
Energy carrier (MaStR)
Wind
Operating status (MaStR)
In Planung

Evidence confidence

MaStR evidence: HIGH. This describes how strongly MaStR supports the registry change itself. It does not mean the inferred commercial opportunity is real. External verification: not checked; no sources outside MaStR have been consulted.

Registry signal only. It does not establish procurement activity, construction status, contracts, financing or buyer intent.

Snapshot transition

16 Sept 2026 → 17 Sept 2026

← Back to the brief · 2026-09-20